Seattle’s new park tax district would raise $54 million per year


Toronto’s parks face a maintenance backlog of $295 million in 2014. That number is expected to grow to some $360 million by 2018. That’s a lot of broken benches, crumbling pathways, and cracked tennis courts. While money for buying and building new parks can come from levies on development, maintenance funding cannot.

Seattle is also facing a big maintenance backlog—in the ballpark of $270 million. So what’s their solution?

The mayor, Ed Murray, is supporting a proposal for a new metropolitan park district that will levy a—hold onto your hats—property tax. This proposal is different than a “park improvement district,” which some cities have created to fund specific parks by levying a tax on businesses and sometimes residential properties in the immediate vicinity of the park.

Seattle’s park district would mirror the boundaries of the City of Seattle and would start with a levy of 42 cents per $1,000 of assessed home value. So a house assessed at $400,000 would pay $14 more a month, or about 50 cents a day. This would raise $54 million per year.

$54 million! Per year!

The bulk of this money would go for maintenance and upkeep, but some would be set aside for programming for disadvantaged populations, funding for park partnerships to activate the city’s downtown parks, creating new parks on city-owned land, and increasing hours for and improving community centres. But who wants any of those things, right?

The creation of the park district creates an on-going, stable, and dedicated revenue source for the city’s parks. Many politicians stammer when asked about property taxes, but the reality is, especially for Canadian cities, it’s the major revenue tool they’ve been given.

Could Toronto use something like this? To put into context: $54 million represents a full third of the $168 million in the 2014 capital budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation and $7.5 million more than the city is spending on the state of good repair backlog for parks and recreation in 2014.

I think Seattle mayor Ed Murray sums up the need for increased parks funding best here:

“We understand that a safe, active, and accessible parks system is an essential part of a healthy, vibrant, thriving city. By providing sustainable funding for much-needed repairs and improvements at our parks, we have an opportunity to be more than grateful beneficiaries of a previous legacy–we can create our own legacy for future generations.”

One thought on “Seattle’s new park tax district would raise $54 million per year

  1. Great writing! I wish we had someone with your skills and interest here.

    Seattle now has the Parks District you mentioned. The 25 year backlog of maintenance is finally being addressed. Hooray! But neither the Parks people nor the Mayor and city council want to buy more land for parks. They refuse to adequately require developers to fund parks and only got a gesture of funding towards housing affordabilty. But they brag on it,
    ‘The Grand Bargain’ it is called. Masses of homeless people are everywhere.

    Almost overnight the City is transforming itself into a density rich, Smart Growth icon. But concurrent infrastructure–mass transit, affordable housing, schools, parks– is not part of the package with developers. We are City that is awash in money from all the techies moving here, but with the city budget from the depression. Private land that is green is disappearing fast, and 150,000 more people are expected to move here Parks goals notably lack a push to acquire the land needed to offset environmental losses and meet the recreational needs of the future. I call it the No New Parks plan. Tragic.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s